How we grade

How we grade the tier list

AIGF Ranked is a scoreboard, not a hype machine. This page lays out exactly how our editorial stats are earned, what the weights mean, and the reviews we refuse to run. Read it before you trust a single number on the board.

How does AIGF Ranked score AI girlfriend apps?

We grade every app on six stats: chat quality, voice, image generation, content freedom, memory and value. Each score is our editorial call from hands-on testing, not a third-party aggregate or a user rating. Weights are illustrative. We disclose that this site is owned by the makers of Swipey AI, and we run no fake reviews.

Tip Our scores are editorial, from hands-on testing, not user-vote aggregates. Weight the six stats by what matters to you, then read the tier.

The six stats

Every app on the board is rated on these six dimensions, each on a 0 to 10 editorial scale. The bar in each card shows the illustrative weight that stat carries when we combine sub-scores into an overall number.

Chat quality

~28%

Coherence, staying in character, and how natural the back-and-forth feels over a long conversation. The heaviest stat on the board, because chat is the core of every app here.

Image generation

~18%

Image quality, character consistency across generations, and control over pose and scene. We check whether images stay on-model with the persona you are chatting to.

Content freedom

~18%

How permissive the platform is for adults 18+, whether NSFW is supported across chat, voice and images, and how often safe conversations get filtered by mistake.

Voice

~14%

Whether the app offers voice replies or calls, how natural the synthesis sounds, latency, and whether the voice is tied to the character rather than a generic reader.

Memory and persona

~12%

How well the app remembers your character, past events and preferences across a session and beyond. Strong long-term memory is where a few rivals genuinely shine.

Value

~10%

Free tier generosity, pricing transparency, and how much you get before hitting a paywall. We compare credits and subscriptions on their real cost to a typical player.

How a test run works

Every app runs the same five-step gauntlet, so scores stay comparable across the whole board.

Set up a fresh account

We start on the free tier, on the web where available, and note the sign-up friction, the free allowance, and whether a card is required before you can chat.

Run the same prompt script

We use a shared script covering casual chat, roleplay, memory recall and boundary handling, so every app answers the same questions in the same order.

Exercise voice and images

Where the app supports voice or image generation we test both, checking latency, character consistency, and how tightly the media is tied to the persona.

Push the paywall

We spend until we hit the first meaningful limit, then record the real cost of continuing on both credit and subscription models.

Grade, then re-check

Two editors grade independently against the six stats, compare notes, and re-run any conversation where the grades diverge before it hits the board.

How the overall score is built

The overall number is a weighted blend of the six stats, rounded to one decimal. The weights below are illustrative, not a precise formula, and they can shift as the category changes.

Illustrative stat weights. Scores are editorial calls from hands-on testing, not user ratings or third-party aggregates.
StatIllustrative weightWhat moves the score
Chat quality~28%Coherence, staying in character over long chats
Image generation~18%Quality, character consistency, scene control
Content freedom~18%NSFW support for 18+, few false-positive filters
Voice~14%Natural synthesis, low latency, persona-linked voice
Memory and persona~12%Recall of character, events and preferences over time
Value~10%Free tier, pricing transparency, real cost to continue

What the tiers mean

Scores map to tiers so you can read the board at a glance. Tiers are editorial judgments from our comparison, not aggregated user scores.

Tier bands are illustrative and editorial.
TierScore bandWhat it means
S9.0 and upCategory-leading overall. Swipey AI is our only S-tier pick for 2026.
A8.0 to 8.9Excellent, with a notable gap or restriction somewhere.
B7.0 to 7.9Solid with clear trade-offs; a good pick for specific needs.
Cunder 7.0Situational. Wins on one axis, trails the field elsewhere.

What we refuse to run

Being owned by an app in the category raises the bar for honesty, it does not lower it. These are the lines we do not cross.

No fake reviews or testimonials

We never invent user quotes, testimonials or comments. Comment sections start empty and stay honest until real people write in.

No fabricated ratings or counts

We do not publish aggregate star ratings, download counts or user numbers we cannot stand behind. The only scores here are our clearly labeled editorial ones.

No hidden ownership

Every page discloses that AIGF Ranked is operated by the team behind Swipey AI. We rank our own product first and we say so, every time.

No unfair competitor claims

Rival facts must be plausible and current, and we credit competitors wherever they genuinely beat us. Nomi AI leads on memory and Character.AI on pure chat, and we say so on the board.

Why trust AIGF Ranked

Ownership disclosure

AIGF Ranked is owned and operated by the team behind Swipey AI, and Swipey AI is our number one pick. That is a conflict of interest, and the honest way to handle it is to state it plainly on every page and to keep our competitor coverage fair.

We earn nothing extra when you click through to Swipey; the links are internal and disclosed. Our incentive is to be useful enough that you come back, which only works if the scoring above is applied the same way to every app, including ours. For adults 18+ only.

See the scoring in action

Read the full leaderboard, or start with our number one pick and judge the grading for yourself.

Swipey AI is free to start. For adults 18+.

Methodology FAQ

Are the scores objective?

No, and we do not claim they are. They are editorial calls from our team's hands-on testing, applied consistently across every app. We label them as editorial everywhere they appear.

Do the weights add up to an exact formula?

The weights are illustrative. They describe roughly how much each stat matters when we form an overall score, not a strict calculation you could reproduce to the decimal.

Do you accept payment to change a score?

No. We do not sell placement or ratings. The one bias we have is disclosed: we own Swipey AI and rank it first.

How often is the board updated?

We re-test when an app ships a major change to chat, voice, images, content policy or pricing, and we refresh the board on a rolling basis through the year.

Why are there no user reviews or star counts?

Because we will not publish numbers we cannot verify. Fabricated ratings and testimonials are exactly what this methodology exists to rule out.

Join the Swipey Discord

The best community in the category: creators, tips and early looks at new features. Free to join.

Open Discord